DentalWriter Forum

Your central resource for DentalWriter posts, blogs, training resources, faq's, and more.

Notification

Icon
Error

Post a reply
From:
Message:

Maximum number of characters in each post is: 32767
Bold Italic Underline   Highlight Quote Choose Language for Syntax Highlighting Insert Image Create Link   Unordered List Ordered List   Left Justify Center Justify Right Justify   More BBCode Tags Check Spelling
Font Color: Font Size:
Security Image:
Enter The Letters From The Security Image:
  Preview Post Cancel

Last 10 Posts (In reverse order)
courtneydsnow Posted: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 7:50:31 AM(UTC)
 
Hi Guest!

Great question. I can't really comment on whether the logic behind that makes sense or not, however yes it is fairly common for a medical insurer to offer coverage for a surgical part of treatment, but not a part of treatment they consider dental or cosmetic in nature. (many medical policies will offer coverage for orthodontic services for medically necessary pediatric ortho (19 & under) or in accident cases as well).

If you would like to tell me the name of your insurance company, I would be happy to look up their medical coverage policy for cleft lip/palate and orthodontic procedures to see if I can shed some light on if the policy is in fact written that way or not.
Guest Posted: Monday, July 23, 2018 12:10:28 PM(UTC)
 
Hello, I have a medical company that states that they cover surgical treatment for Cleft lip/Palate cases, but the orthodontia services needed in conjunction to prepare the patient for surgery (usually billable under 41899) will not be not covered unless teeth are impacted. Does this make sense? I am not billing for the treatment of the impacted teeth...I think? Maybe? What do you think?